Thursday, June 30, 2005

Love and Submit

This is an article written by Frances Ong Hock Lin on Today Newspaper on 28 Jun 05 about love and obey. I find the article interesting and thought it could invoke some thoughts from everyone, and so I have posted it here. What do you think?
-------------
Seventeen years ago, my unhappy father walked me down the aisle in a Katong church. He was about to hand over his daughter to a man who eagerly grabbed her arms, as if to make sure the bride would be given away. My father left midway through the ceremony — to drown his sorrows at the famous Marine Parade Satay Stall. But it was my grandfather who had the greatest impact on our marriage.

He told me that people used to marry to fall in love, but that people now fall in love to get married. He saw marriages going up in smoke after the initial passions burned out. He believed that a wedding is only a day, but a marriage is a lifetime. He was match-made to my grandmother, a great cook, and he surmised that she would support him in whatever he did. I have never seen them quarrel.

From her, I learned how to make a husband happy. She saved the best meat for him, and would eat only when he was at the dinner table. Even after slaving the whole day over a hot stove, she would be bathed and powdered when he returned from work. And his slippers and a glass of water were always there to welcome him.

My grandfather, who knew I was an outspoken and stubborn child, worried that having a university education might make it difficult for me to submit to my husband. Growing up in the 1970s, with women fighting for equal rights, I was at first shocked by what he advocated. I fought a good fight at university, debating with my male tutorial mates. At work, I do not believe in the glass ceiling for women, and do not see myself as weaker then men. But it was in the home context that I realised my grandfather's foresight and wisdom.

A marriage is not an equal partnership, where a couple are looking constantly to ensure that everything is divided 50-50. That makes us calculative and mean, and reduces the marriage to a conditional clause: As long as he lives up to his end of the bargain, so will I. Instead of looking for the right person to be our spouse, we have to be the right person for them. We have to give 110 per cent without any conditions or strings attached to the marriage contract — which, hopefully, we enter into with our eyes open. The marriage vow basically says that even if a husband turns out to be a scumbag or a couch potato who cares more for Man U than for his mother-in-law, we still have to accept him.

My husband and I have demanding careers, but when we come home, I give him a sponge bath even if I am tired. I prepare supper, and yes, I do peel prawns for him. I do so without asking for anything in return. He is the head of the household. When it comes to any major decision, his vote counts for 60 per cent, and mine for 40 per cent. My grandfather was right. This is difficult. I find it challenging to submit to my husband. But I discovered that once I learned to obey him, it gave him a greater sense of responsibility, of wanting to take care of the family even more. In addition, when my children see that I obey him, they learn to obey him and respect him as a father.Being the heart of the family, my role is to complement, and not to compete with, his. I never challenge his views in front of others, which would make him feel small, insignificant and disrespected. We try not to fight or quarrel in front of the children. Yes, we have thought of walking out of this marriage many times, but then we remembered that we started out with the belief that divorce was not an option.

We will continue to fight, and our marriage will be a rollercoaster ride. Given a chance, would I walk down the aisle again to the same man? Yes, I would, but this time I would obey him the minute he married me.

The writer, an educator, celebrated her 17th wedding anniversary this month.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

An interesting article...

Overall, I like and agree with Frances on her attitude of submission towards her husband, perhaps, there are much for us to learn here. I think it is not easy for two persons/people to live together, because we each have our individual will and ways of doing things, so it does require a lot to work things out. I guess we must really love the other person (much more than ourselves), to be able to accomplish that, isn't it?

There are certain points which I do not agree though...
1) Olden-days-type-of-matchmaking, by humans (But if God is the Matchmaker, then it's a different story lah. Even then, it requires obedience, submission and many other components for that marriage to work...)
If by interacting, observing and assessing a person for a number of years, during the time of courtship, there is still a possibility that we can make a wrong decision by marrying the wrong/unsuitable person, what makes us so sure that the matchmakers in the olden days, knew better which two persons are suited for each other, esp. when the couple weren't given sufficient time to get to know each other, or no chance to know each other at all? The thought itself scares me! Imagine you hardly know a person, and the next thing you know, he/she becomes your husband/wife, and you are required to live with this person, in an intimate manner, for the rest of your life?! Based on what factors did the matchmakers determined the compatibility of the two persons? Their family backgrounds? How rich or poor both sides of the families were? Their looks or external appearances? ....If we end up marrying the wrong person of our choice, there is a possibility that we were looking for the wrong things/attributes in the first place, it's not that the olden days matchmakers are better.

2) Some people tend to think that the older generation have better success in their marriages, just because divorce rates were lower then, and couples stay married till old age. I think that the length of time whereby a couple stay married is not the determining factor whether a marriage is successful. I think the quality of that marriage is more important, eg. the depth of that relationship, the sharing together of their lives (emotionally, psychologically, intellectually, and of course spiritually), the depth of understanding, communication, mutual respect, love, trust, etc. And if these values are practised and upheld, I suppose that marriage will last. I assume that true quality in a marriage will bring about lasting ones.

People in the olden days stayed married not because they are happy together, but they did not have a choice, esp. the women. Most of them were not educated and did not possess any skills to earn a living, divorce is almost like passing a death sentence to them. So, they stayed married for that bowl of rice. Ever thought about cases whereby the husbands abused their wives physically and/or emotionally continually, they were unfaithful and mess around with other women(it was esp. common for the rich ones), and women were supposed to bear with all this type of treatment all their lives? Living without dignity? The marriage covenant has been broken already.

I am not advocating divorce. It should be the last resort for couples, and most probably it is a painful decision. Perhaps, many couples are choosing the easy way out by divorcing nowadays, instead of exploring any and every way to resolve the issues/differences in their marriage. We should not. Unless we have exhausted every mean to save that marriage. Even then, there are lessons to be learnt from each unsuccessful relationship, if we fail to learn from it, there is a possibility that history will repeat itself. If we learn from the lessons, there is a possibility that we can have a very fulfilling relationship we never thought we could ever have again.

We should not place the blame of increasing divorce rates on the fact that women are more highly educated today. Higher education is not the culprit, it is that self-centredness, self-fishness and self-seeking, that is to be blamed. Frances' grandmother had a good relationship, not because she did not have a university degree, but she placed her husband's well-being and interest above her own... Frances did the same thing by honoring and submitting to her husband. I guess when we love our spouses more than ourselves, put their well-being and interests before ours, it's easier to submit to them.

Ever thought of the benefits of education in a marriage? If a woman's mind and emotion have been educated (beyond academic achievements), she would have that ability to analyse, grasp the depth of things better, thus able to minister to the needs of the husband more effectively. It may also mean ability to empathize the struggles that the spouse is going through, with words of encouragement, even practical ways that will help the situation. It goes beyond telling the husband : "Your meal is ready... the water is ready for your shower..." Because she may not be able to comprehend many things intellectually or emotionally due to lack of true education.

I know that many women today are looking for a man who can take care of their needs, materially(esp.) and emotionally. Many hope to find one who will slog just to buy them diamonds, so that they can boost among their friends, to see who has the highest carat among all. To bring them for holidays now and then, to pamper them and give in to them whether they are in the right or wrong, whether they are being reasonable or not. To have a family with kids coming along the way, so that you can boast about a happy family with bright kids in time to come. However, if the predominant and primary factor/factors is driven by SELF, what you want, what you can get or receive from a spouse or from a marriage, instead of what you can give/share/contribute to a person in a relationship/marriage, perhaps it is not sufficient to sustain a relationship in the long run. Sure, we will receive lots of love and fulfilment through it, but I guess we must be prepared to give self-lessly first...

What is your opinion?

*** There is a difference between obedience and submission. We need not obey or agree with our spouse every time, but we can still choose to be submissive in our attitude towards them even when we disagree, instead of challenging them. I'd prefer the title of this article to be : 'Love and Submit'.

crazyjarjar said...

Yeah, I think so too....now it is Love and Submit :)

Anonymous said...

No One is perfect - men or women. It is the will to make things happen; the selfless whom succeeds, and the selfish whom never will. By and large, Singaporeans are not extremists, we are indeed blessed that things do work out if you choose to.